Howdy,

This is a little missive from an astronomer on the delicate subject of the divergence of UTC from UTx. It seems that those bastards in the precision timing community want to abandon UTC's leap seconds entirely because they are too much trouble, and he's hopping mad.

Note that my message was composed for astronomers, not you guys. Several of us in the astronomical software community have been following this issue since before Y2K:

    http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs

We are as "hopping mad" about the sneaky process as about the proposal. Note our two tiered objection: they not only propose to cease issuing leap seconds, they propose to continue calling the resulting time scale "Coordinated Universal Time". There are many flavors of UT - UTC should not be divorced from the others. Call a leap second-less civil time anything you want - simply don't call it "UTC".

[His most amusing argument against modifying UTC is that astronomy software tends to use UTC not UT1 etc.]

Amusing how? Clocks must certainly represent the most familiar scientific instruments in households and offices worldwide. People best use instruments that provide handy and simple measurements with minimal fuss. All measurements are approximations of one type or another. A one second level approximation of UTC - a measure of Earth Orientation - is extremely handy for folks who need such things. Most people, most of the time, don't happen to need Universal Time to any great precision. It is vital at other times.

Also note that UT1 is only available after the fact. UTC is a deterministic (if segmented) timescale which provides not only an approximation (and prediction) of UT1, but also provides access to TAI two or three orders of magnitude more precisely yet. It may not be perfect, but then - this proposal isn't designed to provide something better. Imagine what might have been achieved if the precision timing community had spent the seven year leap second hiatus working to improve UTC rather than to sabotage it.

I find it surreal that it is the precision timing community who are arguing that the public have no need for access to precision time.

Rob Seaman
NOAO

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Reply via email to