Hi Folks, the complete technical information about the Resolution T including a complete handbook can be downloaded from the Trimble pages. Having used the Motorola binary protocol myself, i would judge the Trimble protocol is more easy to implemement. However, it seems as if a lot of more information is spread over a lot more telegram types compared to Motorola binary. So, if one is going to implement the Trimble protocol (like me) he should expect a lot of not so difficult work. Trimble supplies a C++ example (Tools.Zip) for pc applications. I have seen better stuff concerning the serial communication routines but the pure telegram decoding routines are surely ok and may save you a lot of work.
Ulrich Bangert > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Poul-Henning Kamp > Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. November 2005 17:03 > An: Tom Van Baak; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Resolution T > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom > Van Baak" writes: > >> has anybody of you personal experience with the Trimble > Resolution T > >> time receiver? May be this one will be the definite > successor to the > >> Motorola M12+ ? > > > >http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/res-t/ > > Have you worked with the serial protocol ? Is it any good ? > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by > incompetence. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.febo.com/cgi-> bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
