Long time since I played with a LORAN-C timing receiver, but the Austron units were good to a microsecond. Interesting to know what the newer technology can manage.
Rob K -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Murray Sent: 21 April 2006 07:37 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran - any good for timekeeping? > The US is keeping Loran-C going as a backup for GPS as well. .... How good is Loran for timekeeping? How does it compare to WWVB? What sort of receiver do I need? Any good how-to type web pages? I'm in Silicon Valley. The NIST map says that WWVB should work here, but my quick try didn't get very far. I was just using a small ferrite antenna and I didn't check the tuning. -- The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my other mailboxes. Please do not send unsolicited bulk e-mail or unsolicited commercial e-mail to my suespammers.org address or any of my other addresses. These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
