Magnus Danielson wrote: >Hi folks, > >I got this message, and I assume you would find it interesting. > >8<---- >Due to the extended life of the GPS satellites, we are now facing the >possibility there will be more than 30 satellites in the constellation. It >is believed this might be a problem in some receivers. Receiver >manufacturers should be able to confirm if this is a problem. The Memo at >http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/gps/gpsnotices/50SW_GPSW_letter.pdf gives more >information. > >Civil responses: If you believe this will cause a problem, please contact >NAVCEN at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] by 20 October 2006. > > >What is the best way to forward this to the telecom community? > > Don't know what the "best way" would be but
www.atis.org has a committee T1X1.3 that is concerned with synchronization matters An email to them might be useful Bill K7NOM >I have not planned to be in Vancouver next week, though I am aware that >there is an OPTXS and an ITU-T meeting. This seems important enough that >ITU-T participants would want to know and check with their receiver >manufacturers. That is, I think both U.S. and international telecom users >should consider whether their receivers will fail because of this. > >Charles, perhaps you can forward this to appropriate people in Europe; >perhaps at least members of the ITSF steering committee. > >Regards, >Marc >---->8 > >With the GPS constallation hitting 32 we seems to run out of "legal" PRN codes >even. > >Cheers, >Magnus > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > > > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
