My first post...newbie...be gentle... I spent the last several evenings reading the archives and saw mention of sawtooth error correction in software. Since the corrections to be applied are on the order of 1e-9 seconds it would seem that the phase detector outputs to which these are applied must be similar in resolution.
That would seem to require a pretty hefty phase detector and a pretty substantial computing resource. Doesn't sound inexpensive. Is there a way around this? OTOH, the Dallas Semi delay line pushes the "computation" out into the input of the phase detector at the cost of a $17 chip (1k qty) which in small quantities is likely $50 or so. This would seem to allow for a wider variety of phase measurement techniques. Do I have this right? tnx jim miller ab3cv _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
