On 5/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In a message dated 5/16/2007 21:37:57 Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I routinely reboot all of our Windows machines; otherwise > they become flaky and unreliable. Win 98 needed to be > done about twice a day or they'd crash. Win 2000 will often > last several days. Linux boxes never need rebooting...
> Oh, come on. No more "Linux is so great, and Windows really sucks" bashing. > One of my Win2K system has been running flawlessly for over 6 months now, Win2k is much more stable than Win9x..especially at a decent patchlevel. For example, if unpatched the famous 49.7 day bug only costs you 60% of your performance on Win2k, whereas on Win9x it just crashes. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q216641/ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823273 -- Margaret Stephanie Leber CCP, SCJP SCWCD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://voicenet.com/~maggie AOPA 925383 -- Amateur Radio Station K3XS -- ARRL 39280 -- AMSAT 32844 "The art of progress is to preserve order amid change and to preserve change amid order."-A.N.Whitehead _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
