); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY In a message dated 8/28/2007 19:53:06 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Anything else is a BAD idea. This certainly includes any path that results >in JPEG of any sort, GIF, TIFF, or any other raster images except maybe for >thumbnails. I don't care if your raster compression technology is lossless; Hi CH, respectfully disagree: that would mean we should get out our good-old pen-plotters and vector-graphics displays as well? But even those rasterize in their DAC and Stepper-Motor resolutions... High-resolution raster-files can guarantee that all traces in a schematic line up, the text has the correct size and type etc, and no one in Asia is modifying the files. File-size is not an issue, our 5-page schematics in 600 dpi turn into a beautiful and tiny 105 KByte PDF file that prints perfectly even on D-Size paper. 105KB is probably less space than an embedded font would take. Especially for schematics run-length coding works wonders on raster files. bye, Said ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
