); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY At 03:35 PM 10/31/2007, you wrote: >); SAEximRunCond expanded to false >Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY > >At 02:31 PM 10/31/2007 , John Day wrote: > > > >You beat me to it Poul-Henning, the legend is first documented in > >1958, but did not involve Bohr. I heard it in 1971 in the UK and gain > >in 1973 in the US - by then it is attributed to Bohr. > > > >Some sources say that Rutherford was the arbiter. Why would > >Rutherford have become involved? But it is true that around 1911 Bohr > >did work in Rutherfords laboratory. > > > >I later again heard the same legend in California in 1976, but about > >some other eminently undistinguished candidate, not Bohr.
>So, who's going to submit this urban legend to Snopes for them to track down? It's on snopes as far as I know. John >-- >newell N5TNL > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] >To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
