Rex wrote: >> You still >> might need a trunk full of batteries though... >> >> jeff >> >> > As a ham, I've got a vehicle with a bunch of batteries and they charge > off of my engine, but let's be practical. I'd rather spend my battery's > energy on long term receiving and on transmitting significant power than > on feeding a rubidium or such. Of course, in that vein, I believe my > lower power timing solution is adequate to get me making contacts on the > frequency. As per my other post tonight, I think a good ocxo is. > > TVB, in his story, implied some of the challenges of feeding three > Cesium standards for several days inside of his vehicle. More details > would be interesting in what he used. > > Hmm. Another topic for discussion. Power consumption vs good or better > time-nuts performance. Has this been discussed? If not let's start a new > thread. > Rex
Would it not be best to collect the relevant performance and power consumption data for known solutions and summarise it in the form of a table/spreadsheet or similar? This could then serve as a baseline for new designs/suggestions. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.