From: Chuck Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GIMP VS PhotoShop Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:48:29 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I happen to like the way Gimp is laid out, but I can > see how others might not... I am more of a function over > appearance sort of guy. The Gimp is so much more powerful > than Adobe Photoshop that it compelled me to learn its way of > doing things. It is a WordPerfect vs Word kind of difference > in my view. > > Like most open source software, turning The Gimp into > a clone of Adobe Photoshop is simply a matter of changing > the "skin", a trivially easy thing to do... The whole gimp > user interface is just a little XML code. Anyone care to > speculate on how easy it would be to make Adobe Photoshop > work and look like the Gimp? Or to make Microsoft Word work > and look like WordPerfect? Or for that matter, make Microsoft > Vista look and work like KDE or Gnome? > > -Chuck Harris Yes, yes, yes... but how will GIMP/Photoshop/VFSH improve my stability and accuracy? Except for allowing me to fiddle with the graphs to display better values than I actually acheive. Cheers, Magnus _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
