> Tom - > > Nice data. It really confirms what I initially posted. Your measurements > were at 5 MHz, so, the expected number at 10 MHz would be 6 dB worse. The > -155 dBc/Hz number quoted by memory from me then was not that far of at all. > - Mike
Hi Mike, What's the math behind why an equivalently good 10 MHz reference is always(?) 6 dB above a 5 MHz reference? /tvb _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
