Tom Clifton wrote: > The manual doesn't give much direction on tweaking the disciplining > parameters. Also, not having anything better to compare results to, I'm > pretty handicapped. Has anybody done any tweaking and perhaps can offer any > suggestions? > > Over the weekend I was able to get a GPS antenna on the roof coupled to the > receiver in the basement by using an abandoned run of RG6 (Thanks Direct-TV! > - The AT&T U-Verse doesn't fade during storms...) Logging of the 10mhz shows > it stays pretty much under 0.05ppb. The Excel graphs are easy to generate, > but not easy to use if that makes sense. Limited to 32k datapoints per graph > and very difficult to zoom in on. > > Also, Is anybody else as confused as I am by negative ppb numbers??? is > 0.00ppb the 10x-11 "baseline" so that -0.01ppb is really 0.009ppb? > > Tom > > Tom
Surely the ppb measure just reflects the measured frequency error (actual OCXO frequency - 10.00000000000000000000000MHz ) in parts per billion, so a -ve ppb just means the sign of the error has opp0site that for a +ve ppb number. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
