Hi Bruce, yup, I thought that circuit and it's claim to 32 bit resolution was over the top too, I didn't actually read the details. Coarsedac changes are an issue as you mentioned, but one can get around them by scaling the two dacs in a way to only use a couple of bits from the coarsedac, and operate most of the time using just the fine dac.
This is similar to a mechanical coarse adjustment (such as on the 10811A) setting the approximate voltage range, with the EFC done by the fine dac. If you use a 16 - 18 bit fine dac, and 6 - 8 bits of a coarse dac then this works quite well, and with a low aging SC-cut crystal you may never see a coarsedac change, while still having over 21+ bits of overall resolution. It's fairly straight forward to improve the resolution of a good Dac by 2, 3 or even 4 bits using PWM, see Tom's description of how this is done in a Z3801A on leapsecond.com. So in short, one could use two identical 16 bit dacs, scale the resistors so that only the upper 6 - 7 bits are used as a coarsedac, and use the fine dac as a 20 bit dac with PWM resolution-enhancement (16 to 20 bits). This would yield more than 26 bits theoretically from 2 inexpensive 16 bit dacs, and the noise could be removed by low pass filtering using an analog filter with say less than 0.3Hz cutoff frequency similar to the Z3801A circuitry. In this case the coarsedac can probably even be exchanged for a simple high-stability pot. It does require a bit of real time firmware to do the PWM enhancement of course. bye, Said In a message dated 12/1/2008 22:47:29 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The major advantage of such a DAC is the inherent monotonicity which cannot be achieved and maintained (around coarse DAC transitions) without frequent calibration when the outputs of 2 16 bit DACs are combined. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
