Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[email protected]>, John Ackermann N8UR writes:
> 
>> The TADD-2 [...]
> 
> Finally that middle shoe drops :-)
> 

:-)

The back story is that after the TADD-1 I started working on a divider, 
but instead of the PIC-based code decided to use a CPLD instead.  It was 
a fine idea, but involved me learning a whole new craft (PLD 
programming) and despite help from some on the list, I never got things 
to the state where I was comfortable with either the hardware or the 
software implementation.  So, the TADD-2 slipped to the back burner.

Then, two things happened: (a) I found myself *needing* a divider, and 
(b) Rich McCorkle offered his version of TVB's code that could handle 
both 5 and 10 MHz inputs; my need was connected with a 5 MHz standard.

By the way, for those new here, "TADD" stands for many things:

Totally Awesome Distribution Device     (TADD-1)
                Digital Divider         (TADD-2)
                Divider Dongle          (TADD-2 Mini)
                Digital Distribution    (TADD-3)

At TAPR, we're working hard to use our acronym resources wisely.

John


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to