The CNS-II is very nice, but is more aligned with NTS applications than precision frequency. Also by the time you add an OCXO the cost is well over $2000. The Jackson Labs < http://www.jackson-labs.com/index.html > Fury or Firefly would be a better comparison to the Thunderbolt. Said is a regular poster here.
Robert G8RPI. --- On Mon, 1/6/09, Jim Palfreyman <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jim Palfreyman <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt - any negatives ? > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, 1 June, 2009, 6:14 AM > Nice little unit and *great* value > for money. My power supply (from the > group buy) died - but that's another issue completely. The > unit itself I > have no complaints about. > > However, if you have plenty of money and want to go more up > market try a CNS > Mark II: > > http://www.cnssys.com/cnsclock/CNSClockII.php > > > > 2009/6/1 Pete Lancashire <[email protected]> > > > Thanks to those that have replied. It looks like just > about everyone > > recommended the Thunderbolt. But before I invest .. > any negative > > comments ? Specs, reliability, or ? > > > > -pete > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
