I'm somewhat surprised that this thread has not caused that other term
for exceptionally fine measurement to crop up; the RCH
At 09:39 AM 8/19/2009, you wrote:
In a message dated 19/08/2009 17:25:00 GMT Daylight Time,
james.p....@jpl.nasa.gov writes:
Next up, we need to decide which species of gnat is being referred to..
And whether or not the gnat's ass is a part of his anatomy, by definition
quite small, or his means of transport, by breeding generally quite large:-)
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.
Peter Cooper, of Fermi Lab, says, "Every experimentalist knows
that the apparatus, or at least your understanding of it, is
always at fault until demonstrated otherwise." He also says,
"Nature is really unmoved by what I, or anyone else, believes."
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
