> In message <[email protected]>,
> "J. For
> ster" writes:
>>I neglected to mention there are very, very good reasons to have a single
>>master frequency standard and distribution amp for a lab. IMO, that is
>> far
>>more important than the standard's absolute accuracy.
>
> You should have a master clock, yes, but you should also have a free
> running alternate clock, you can use to validate that you are not
> seeing instrument synchronizm effects in your measurements.
>
> Poul-Henning
>
And to observe this free running clock, could be a task for that Z12 -
discussed in another thread - with an external frequency input.
--
Björn
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
