Hi As I recall there are "good reasons" for the temperatures that the physics package gets stabilized to. Something about the C-field and the temperature combining to improve the state selection.
Of course we have made it to the eiswein, so that may be a bit off... Bob On Dec 31, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: > Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> If you separate the the electronics from the physics package then you will >> need to think pretty hard about magnetic shielding. > > The physical package is what needs to sit inside the my-metal. > >> It is clear though that if you are going to run an LPRO off of batteries, >> you want to let it warm up. The energy savings likely outweigh the loss of >> reliability. The reliability penalty is real. I have indeed "cooked" >> rubidiums. In each case it was not the heater circuits or the lamp that >> failed. > > The important thing for the exercise is to stabilize temperature. To what > temperature is a matter of choise. > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
