mike cook wrote:
Yes Bruce, I also think that azimuth dependent masking would be useful.

I have been suffering from strong reflections from facing buildings at 50m to 100m, which cause sharp departures from the average PPS TI

While telling the nav algorithms inside the box would be the most clever way, you could also put up a fence of RF absorber (or perhaps even conductive sheet) at some distance from the antenna. The wavelength is on the order of 25-30 cm, so a fence a couple meters away is in the "far field"

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to