Hi Part of my problem is that all I have to go on are the Trimble definitions of the terms. I'm just playing with the numbers that load into the device, not doing an external loop.
There's no way to *eliminate* an instantaneous output change when there's an input change with a simple loop. You can only work to minimize it. When you do so, there may be side effects that you would rather avoid. I'm pretty sure that looking at the output of the TBolt against a cesium would show that it's a crummy time standard when you tune it as a frequency standard. Bob On May 11, 2010, at 4:45 AM, Javier Herrero wrote: > >> May a formula that contains >> >> - an "error" >> - a "current error" >> - a "delta error" >> - a "previous integrated error" >> >> be considered to contain a lot of errors? > pun intended? ;) > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Javier Herrero EMAIL: [email protected] > HV Sistemas S.L. PHONE: +34 949 336 806 > Los Charcones, 17A FAX: +34 949 336 792 > 19170 El Casar - Guadalajara - Spain WEB: http://www.hvsistemas.com > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
