Hi There are a raft of papers on each of the sub portions of the fitting process. Aging, retrace, temperature, and acceleration all have their own issues and fit approaches.
The whole "how (and why that way) do they test a chronometer?" is something there's a lot of papers on as well. Some of them date back into the 1600's. Where do you want to start? Bob -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Rooke Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:05 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Most accurate small crystal Bob, On 27 May 2010 23:43, Bob Camp <[email protected]> wrote: > This sort of thing is *very* algorithm friendly. You can correct for a lot of things after the fact. The results will be a bit variable since it's a "how lucky did you get" sort of thing. They also will tend to degrade over time, as the data you initially loaded in on temperature performance, aging, and G sensitivity departs from reality. I'm very interested in this area, do you know of any sources of studies on this topic? Thanks, Steve > Bob -- Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD A man with one clock knows what time it is; A man with two clocks is never quite sure. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
