On 4 June 2010 02:11, WarrenS <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve said > >> I fully agree that this test was only done for one input source and it >> should be done for as many different types > > > Not true, it was done it many many different ways and units and levels and > etc etc. > I think John spend the better part of a month finding things to test, Bless > his great effort. > I think he was wanting to find something wrong with it, but that is another > story. > To say he did not consider every noise source he could get his hands on does > not give if due credit. > He even made up several new ones, some on purpose and some not so on > purpose.
I stand corrected!!! Ah! but was it tested against a Shortt pendulum clock :) Steve > and the results where always the same. The tested worked as expected. > > ws > > *********** > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once. - Einstein _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
