There is a fairly detailed block schematic that has been posted, even a photo of the proto BB just to show how simple it is. Perhaps a full component level schematic will surface sometime.
I think that the math that is needed to describe this TPLL will have to come from a third-party if that is what is required anyway. Steve On 21 June 2010 12:37, Bob Camp <li...@rtty.us> wrote: > Hi > > Schematics of each of the various implementations tired would be nice. That > would allow others to implement duplicates and see what happened. Without > schematics only approximations can be implemented and analyzed. That > generally opens up more issues than it addresses. The nature of the > conversation so far is not one that encourages participation or shared > experimentation. > > Details of the various experiments attempted would be helpful. The "rabbit > out o the hat" approach to data gets pretty old pretty fast. It's apparent > from various oblique references that far more than the run off against the > Symmetricom box has been done. > > A more rigorous approach to the math is needed if this is ever going to be > accepted. This is after all an area where hair splitting issues over the math > have been a very big deal for at least 40 years. > > Bob > > > On Jun 20, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote: > >> On 06/21/2010 12:49 AM, Chuck Harris wrote: >>> WarrenS wrote: >>>> >>>> GandalfG8 Posted: >>>> > "Snake Oil anyone?" >>>> >>>> I nice short response, but it shows missed the MAJOR difference. You >>>> need to see: >>>> < http://www.thegleam.com/ke5fx/tpll.htm > >>>> ws >>> >>> No disrespect to you or John intended, but that is a data set of one >>> experiment. >>> We used to call that a High School Proof. >>> >>> It takes an infinite number of experiments of that sort to "prove" a >>> conjecture. >> >> It doesn't prove it, just makes it fairly likely correct. >> >> But then again, "correct" is not available here. Sufficiently accurate >> within some bounds is. These bounds can be of a myriad of types. >> >> As for the Warren style TPLL, a particular implementation needs to be >> referred to, both in form of analogue design and digital processing. >> >> From that limiting properties may be established. Some of these may be >> compensated for enhanced performance. >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once. - Einstein _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
