In message <8f43d37e769b4caab3309830e40dd...@warcon28gz>, "WarrenS" writes:
>That is really all there is to it, if one starts with Frequency differences, >like the TPLL, and not Phase, like most other methods, to get the raw data >to use with an ADEV program like "PLOTTER". While it is absolutely true that you can calculate ADEV from frequency measurements, you have a very tough row to hoe when it comes to proving that your frequncy samples represent the same signal as a sequence of zero deadtime period measurements would do. The time-delay inherent in any PLL really, really, really mucks the math up in that respect. With that said, I'm really, really, really sick and tired of this TPLL thread. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
