I just might keep one .. hmmm ... nah got to thin the herd ... nice to know other then interference an antenna is easy.
thanks -pete On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote: >> BTW will soon have half dozen Spectracom 8170's I want make go away as well. > > There was a discussion of the Spectracom 8170 on the ntp list/newsgroup back > in 2005. > > Start here: > https://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2005-August/006313.html > It's a self-signed certificate so you may have troubles with that stuff. > Poke the next-message link at the bottom for the rest of the discussion. > > Quick summary: > > John Ackermann said he was happy using the "AMRAD Active Antenna". > https://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2005-August/006324.html > > Dave Mills said they gave up because of RFI pollution. (and FCC head in sand) > https://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2005-August/006338.html > > > google for >AMRAD Active Antenna< finds: > http://www.prc68.com/I/LF-Ant.shtml > http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/tis/info/pdf/0109031.pdf > > > -- > These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
