note that at 54,9 degrees, one least significant decimal digit in the latitude/longditude is approx 11cm/6cm . That might well explain why there are multiple references.

Le 12/07/2010 11:46, Peter Vince a écrit :
Hello Antonio,

      Looking at the aerial photographs on Google Maps, the transmitter
building can be seen at 54.91224°N, 3.27831°W - nearer Cardurnock than
Anthorn!  Which are the actual aerial masts though, I don't know.
Might I suggest you contact Peter Whibberley at the National Physical
Laboratory (peter.whibberley (at) npl . co . uk) - if he can't tell
you, he will certainly know who can!

      Regards,

           Peter Vince



On 12 July 2010 00:40,<asma...@fc.up.pt>  wrote:
Greetings to the group.

I would like to have the exact (and trustworthy...) WGS84 coordinates
of the Anthorn Loran-C antenna. Searching the net I got at least three
different sets of LAT/LONG. It seems to me that exactitude is not a cult
anymore, except for us the nutties...

I would also appreciate to have the exact Coding Delay for that transmitter.
(Not the Emission Delay, which is known to be 27,300.00 uS).

Thanks in advance.

Antonio
CT1TE


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.







_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to