Hal Murray wrote:
[Lunar Laser Ranging]
Hmm.. the SNR isn't all that huge on the echo. The target is say, 1  square
meter, at a distance of 300,000 km.

  The beam divergence coming back is about the same as the outbound  (that
is, in order to cover 300km on earth, you need to have a spot on  the moon
about 300km in diameter).. So the laser power will be spread  out by a
factor of 71E9.. (about 110 dB). The power reflected back, if  intercepted
by a 1 square meter aperture will have the same "loss"  for  a round trip
loss of around 220dB.

I don't see why the outgoing beam has to be that big. Anything that doesn't hit the corner cubes is wasted.

I thought the size of the corner cubes was picked so that diffraction would spread the beam enough so the telescope would be in the reflected beam


might be...
I seem to recall that the returned beam divergence was no narrower than the incident beam divergence, so if you want a X km footprint on Earth, you need a X km footprint on the Moon.




_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to