On 09/18/2010 02:41 PM, francesco messineo wrote:
First of all, thanks to John and Magnus for inputs and links, makes a
very good start!

On 9/18/10, Magnus Danielson<mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org>  wrote:
On 09/18/2010 09:48 AM, francesco messineo wrote:
Hello all,

sorry for the OT, but the electronic expertise of the group is too good
:-)

I'm looking for ideas and directions (articles and so on) to realize
very good phase noise xtal oscillator, in the range 20-50 MHz for high
performance frequency conversion. I would like to understand what
circuits can be realized (not requiring too much professional and
modern equipment, test eq. from the 70s-80s is ok) and what is the
contribution of the active oscillator device, the xtal itself and the
following buffers.
Another idea that came on my mind was using digital oscillator (square
wave, cmos) and then filtering for sine output, if this makes sense
for a low PN point of view.
Is there any way to measure the close-in PN of oscillators with an
amateur setup?

First of all I think you need to quantify what you mean by "high
performance frequency conversion" and what stability measures you are
seeking as there are many degrees of excessiveness to attempt, and many
of them may be well beyond what you need. Remember, we are time-nuts... :)


Ok, let's say as good as practically and economically feasible for
"single" prototype and homebuilder. I already chosed not to use a
Si570 because I really need only few (2-4) fixed frequencies and I'm
assuming that carefully made xtal oscillators can beat the Si570 phase
noise performance.
The conversion is obviously for a receiver, not for  the classic HF
bands, but  for the lower VHF amateur bands (50-70 MHz) where IMD3
performance of the receiver has to be the best possible, as these
bands are used for TV and radio broadcasts in many nearby countries
around here.
Of course a very good frontend BPF, amplifier and mixer are needed,
but these are less of a problem for me to chose (and are simpler to
evaluate with "standard" test equipment too).
Unfortunately I know very few  low-VHF-nuts and very few of them (if
any) realize their setup performance are so far distant from what can
be achieved nowadays.

I just recalled, you do want to check out John Miles (KE5FX) GPIB toolkit, the PN.EXE software will let you use your spectrum analyzer (if supported) to measure phase-noise. For your purpose it should be useful for you. For some of my phase-noise needs my tools isn't sufficient yeat to do some of the phase-noise measurements I want.

John's home:
http://www.thegleam.com/ke5fx/

John's GPIB toolkit:
http://www.thegleam.com/ke5fx/gpib/readme.htm

John's TimeLab:
http://www.thegleam.com/ke5fx/timelab/readme.htm

I was able to contribute support for my spectrum analyzer with some good help from John. Happy to see it being part of the distribution now.

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to