Well, it depends on the conditions -- you'd have to hold the temperature steady to conclude that, not to mention the reference (which was...?) All of the runs represent good performance for a 10811.
-- john, KE5FX > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]on > Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 12:21 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What is the correct Allan value? > > > In message <962ba941c5ca41c19df45f77608ad...@warcon28gz>, > "WarrenS" writes: > > >What is the correct 100 sec Allan value of this low noise 10811 Osc? > >All plots are of the same OSC, just different parts of the same data run. > > Basically the worst one... > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by > incompetence. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
