As requested I have add a PCB bottom side picture.
If someone want some more informations or any help please ask me directly.
See:
http://www.timeok.it/files/10_to_100_mhz_multiplier.pdf

I remember you the Maser use a multiplier chain from 5 MHz to 1400Mhz as first 
LO in the internal receiver used for PLL the FX to 1.420.xxx .

Thank you, Luciano

Luciano P. S. Paramithiotti



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of [email protected]
Sent: mercoledì 5 gennaio 2011 0.09
To: [email protected]
Subject: [time-nuts] Comparing 10 MHz Oscillators at 10 GHz

Luciano Paramithiotti's January 1 post about his 10-to-100 MHz multiplier 
project reminded me of past musings about using two 10GHz, phase-locked 
oscillators to compare the 10MHz outputs of my T-bolt and LPRO so I  could 
quickly adjust the latter by observing the mixed 10 GHz signals with  a 
microammeter.  I am talking about the California Microwave, Frequency  West, 
etc., modules that were used as local oscillators in commercial microwave  
systems.
 
I was about to ask Luciano for more information on his coil forms, amplifiers, 
and RF chokes when it occurred to me that loop-noise in the PLOs  might force a 
very narrow bandwidth and correspondingly long observation  time.  
Have members of the list been successful with this technique?
 
While most common PLO modules require an input signal in the 100  
MHz-range, I have heard of versions that lock directly to a 10 MHz input.   Is 
anyone 
familiar with these and how difficult it would be to modify  conventional 
oscillators to securely lock to 10 MHz? 
 
Bruce, KG6OJI
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to