Two thoughts... GPS users most likely won't know that Lightsquared is the source of the problem.
And two: LTE moves a lot of bits ( symbols) to multiple users in each transmission, many of which are mobile, at pretty decent bit rates, so the timing and synchronization very likely ARE critical to its success. Tom Holmes, N8ZM Tipp City, OH EM79 > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Mike S > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 6:46 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] From GPS World - Lightsquared has been given > thegoahead > > At 05:54 PM 2/3/2011, gary wrote... > >It only take a little radio knowledge to realize how stupid much of > >what the FCC approves. The FCC raison d'etre is to prevent > >interference. > > I don't see any reason for people to get all excited. GPS is > fundamentally a military system, and has very significant visibility, > being used by _many_ more people than will use the Lightsquared system > - civilian, commercial and governmental in addition to military. If, > upon initial deployment, real world interference is an issue, > Lightsquared will be shut down quickly. There's simply much more > inertia, money, and constituency behind GPS than Lightsquared. > > I asked before if anyone knew the timing requirements for LTE, which is > the technology this is based on. If it requires synchronized timing > like CDMA, then Lightspeed would be shooting themselves in the foot if > they were unable to use GPS based timing within their system. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.