Yes, the TI will get more accurate with time. But the setup suggested in previous email doesn't measure TI.
It measures the standard deviation of that TI. Big difference, two completely different numbers. The SD number is essentially a measure of the absolute amplitude of the noise. Since it is an absolute measurement, it doesn't converge to 0ps. That number will quickly converge to about 20ps to 50ps. It will not get smaller with larger sample sets. Please check the 5370 manual what standard deviation means, it will make sense then. Bye, Said Sent from my iPad On Mar 12, 2011, at 9:27, [email protected] (Mike S) wrote: > At 12:00 PM 3/12/2011, Said Jackson wrote... >> The average will approach 0.0 as the number of samples is increased, but not >> the standard deviation.. The value displayed by their unit is standard >> deviation. > > If you're measuring jitter of an external signal, accuracy is obviously much > worse than the internal jitter. But if you're measuring TI, both the > instrument and signal jitter get reduced with more measurements, leaving a > more accurate TI, doesn't it? > > Being designed and sold as a TI analyzer, that seems right. It seems the > jitter test is mostly to make sure the unit is operating properly. > > If I recall correctly, internal jitter is affected by tweaking the 200 MHz > multiplier. Lacking a proper spectrum analyzer, that's the only calibration I > have been unable to do. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
