I believe thats because RB and CS have cavities that essentially establish the operating size, because they work at a given frequency. You have to go to a different technology method to reduce its size, like the new Symmetricom CS oscillator. Still overall pretty darned amazing in size and power consumption. (Still waiting for the time-nuts offer of $100 each. Limited time offer call before midnight. Shipping and handling included) So at this time it would not be possible to equal the size or power of a typical TCXO these days. 1/4 dip stuff. Though we have given you answers you had not ever really stated what you needed to accomplish. Regards Paul WB8TSL
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net>wrote: > On 05/23/11 09:31 AM, Rob Kimberley wrote: > >> Try >> >> http://www.symmetricom.com/media/files/downloads/product-datasheets/DS_SA.22 >> c.pdf >> >> Rob Kimberley >> > > Thank you. I don't have know what board area I have available, but I think > think its going to be considerably less than that size. I think the only > option will be to use an TCXO, which to be honest is good enough, but if > there were small rubidiums, I would consider using one. But it seems they > are not as small as I would have liked. > > > -- > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.