Sometimes, though, interspersed responses are appropriate. For instance, if you've got a long analysis or list of things, or a list of questions, then answering interspersed is more appropriate. (with a note at the top saying "answers interspersed below")
Many mail clients facilitate the distinguishing of original and new text by adding arrows, change bars, or colors, although some are really annoyingly bad about this (e.g. the webmail client I'm using right now is truly horrible). There's also the problem when the highlighting is done using HTML rendering or which relies on some outside semantic interpretation. -----Original Message----- >From: "Burt I. Weiner" <b...@att.net> >Sent: May 23, 2011 2:24 PM >To: time-nuts@febo.com >Subject: [time-nuts] Top Posting... > >I also prefer top posting. It makes life a lot simpler. > >>From: "Mike Feher" <mfe...@eozinc.com> >>To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'" >> <time-nuts@febo.com> >> >> >>For what it is worth, I agree 100%. I have also been top posting for over 30 >>years. >> >>Another thing that really annoys me is when people comment inside of a >>previous post, about every paragraph/sentence or so. Most of the time it is >>difficult to tell what was the previous post and when the new response >>begins. >> >>Just put it all on top. Regards - Mike > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
