I do not want to minimize the threat posed to GPS by Lightsquared ("LS"), but the post below (i) ignores the last 3 months of debate on the subject and dozens of messages on this list, (ii) mis-states the case against LightSquared, and (iii) ignores the FCC's leading role in the fiasco.

LS did nothing nefarious. The FCC established the basis for an "ancillary terrestrial component" ("ATC") to satellite services that uses terrestrial base stations on satellite frequencies to supplement satellite networks. The first commercial application of ATC was to the satellite radio services ("SDARS"). There was a hue and cry from adjacent WCS licensees, and several FCC proceedings to resolve the issues, which are still under attack.

The FCC, on its own motion and with the blessing of the Administration, has decided that the US desperately needs 500 MHz more of wireless broadband spectrum or we will never recover from the recession. Personally, I believe it is mistaken to think that enabling multi-player gamers and video watchers to squander vast amounts of wireless bandwidth will rejuvenate the economy -- but then, it was not my decision. As a result of this muddled mindset, the FCC has been looking at every possibility to repurpose "underutilized" spectrum for wireless broadband.

One of the FCC's ideas -- and make no mistake, it was the FCC's idea, not something driven by political connections and campaign contributions -- is to greatly expand terrestrial broadband operations in the mobile satellite service ("MSS") bands. No one can reasonably argue that the MSS bands are not "underutilized" -- as I remarked before, you can see the tumbleweeds blowing through.

Currently, expanded terrestrial use of the MSS bands requires a waiver of the "ancillary" part of the ATC rules. However, the FCC has already begun the process of re-allocating the MSS bands to allow purely terrestrial uses on a co-primary basis. When that re-allocation process is complete, the band will be fully open to terrestrial uses and no waiver will be necessary. So, the LS issue is just the tiniest tip of an immense iceberg. And again, that is ALL the FCC's doing. It has nothing to do with graft, corruption, political connections, or campaign contributions. Just bad decisions made in a time of unnecessary panic by the FCC.

LS has simply played by the rules the FCC set out. It acquired huge chunks of MSS spectrum (for which it paid), and has applied to the FCC for the waivers necessary to use the spectrum terrestrially but not necessarily in connection with satellite service. The FCC granted the waivers, subject to the outcome of technical tests demonstrating that such use would not interfere with other spectrum users (primarily, GPS users). A committee was convened to test and report. The report was due on June 15, and from what has been leaked, it documents serious and widespread interference to GPS systems. LS sought (and was granted) an extension until July 1 to submit the report. Last week, LS announced that it intended to launch its service on spectrum lower in the band, in the hopes of avoiding GPS interference, at least for now. GPS interests are still skeptical, and are still fighting.

Anyway, whatever corporate opportunism has been engaged in by LS and its owners, the fault here lies firmly with the FCC, not with LS and supposed bribes and back room deals. As usual, conspiracy theories are readily explained by simple incompetence.

Best regards,

Charles


As some of us know, a company called Lightsquared used political
connections and campaign contributions to short circuit established
FCC procedures to obtain a band of frequencies for the cell phone
system they are developing.  Thanks to their political manipulations
they were able to avoid paying the billions for frequency spectrum
that AT&T, Sprint, Verizon and others have to pay.

But there is a fly in the ointment.  These frequencies are in bands reserved
for satellite transmission.  That is why Lightsquared got the allocation
without bidding and paying billions for them.  These frequencies are
adjacent to the GPS frequencies used by untold millions of users.
When Lightsquared transmits on these frequencies with powerful
ground based transmitters, GPS receivers stop working for several miles.

Now Lightsquared claims it is the responsibility of current GPS users to
buy new devices so Lightsquared can leverage their frequency
allocation.  These new GPS receivers  have yet to be designed.
Some critical applications may never be able to avoid Lightsquared's
signals.



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to