Interesting did go to the site and the library. They mention using the GPS 1pps as a reference for tuning as we discussed earlier. Also the expected jitter and performance mentioned by others on this thread. So indeed, I do not see that the NTP solution is better then 1^-6 or 7th ppm and it does have jumps. Regards Paul
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:05 PM, michael taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Don Latham <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, I essentially want to feed ntpd and its MSoft equivalents. > > > > I found the www.ntp.net site, that apparently has open software to do > > Use <http://www.ntp.org/> instead. You can also look at the Public NTP > pool project, <http://www.pool.ntp.org/>. > > Additional NTP links: > > <http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/ExternalTimeRelatedLinks> > > US NIST & Primary NTP servers <http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi> > Canadian government NTP servers > < > http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/services/inms/time-services/network-time.html > > > UK National Physics Lab NTP servers > < > http://www.npl.co.uk/science-technology/time-frequency/time/products-and-services/time-synchronisation-of-computers-to-utc%28npl%29 > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
