Yes, running everything chilled would be better if low temperature crystal turnovers were available. It is more complicated to chill than heat, of course, even today, but way back when they started temperature stabilizing things it was nearly impossible on a small scale - or at least very impractical, until the advent of TECs. It's also trickier to do both because there's that crossover region where the mode has to shift and you can get dead zones in the control function. Doing heating or cooling only is like a Class-A amplifier - much simpler to keep linear.

I think the main problem with chilling though, is that you get condensation, depending on the humidity (or dewpoint), so you can't go very low in temperature to take advantage of lower noise and bias/leakage currents in devices, without encountering the condensation problem. For example, one of my projects involves making a very stable voltage standard that has the guts inside a TEC-chilled (or warmed) aluminum block. I plan to run it somewhere around 15-20 deg C or so, or as low as I can without having condensation under most conditions, since the guts aren't going to be hermetically sealed inside (but maybe have a rechargeable dessicant). Another project involves building a log attoammeter with the input amplifier TEC-chilled as far down as possible (-40 to -50 deg C or so) to minimize bias current. This one has to be specially guarded, and with the cold block inside a hermetically vacuum sealed enclosure, as any condensation whatsoever - inside or out - could defeat the whole purpose.

Ed


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to