On 27/09/11 22:23, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message<cad2jfagqboeg-iyb5z2_rbjuldj7sbvc5bofpntk45rjesr...@mail.gmail.com>
, paul swed writes:

Boy I have to go back and check. I thought fountains used lasers and such to
slow the atoms down.

They do.  And a microwave field.

But I still think it is easier to make work than the state selection magnets
in a CS.

Of course, there's also the laser-based cesium to consider.


I agree fully. The state selection magnets (Stern-Gerlach experiment) needs to provide a strong gradient field which may be hard to build for the amateur. Building working RF section, vacuum assembly, oven I rate as simpler. Still lot of work to do.

Laser based state-selection and state-detection would indeed be possible, and move the challenges to the optical bench.

One possible aspect to the laser based state-selection and state-detection is that the target could be another oven, such that alternating direction cycling can be used. This addresses the phase-shift issue between the arms in the RF assembly, assuming sufficient stability otherwise. The same issue would not be as dominant in the fountain.

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to