On 11/29/11 3:38 PM, David VanHorn wrote:
Google it. :) ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of J. L. Trantham [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 3:58 PM To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Tongue Testing battery charge levels.... It could be a 'taste' thing. Eveready tastes better than Duracell? Joe -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David VanHorn Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:26 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Tongue Testing battery charge levels.... So you wouldn't advise it with an Eveready #497 battery? VVBG Even with that one I can't imagine getting enough current across the heart to matter. There is more than one reason that defibrillators use such large paddles placed across the chest cavity. Still, I value the functionality of my tongue, so I'll skip that test.
I used to buy those for an electronic flash. I was SO glad when the inverter power pack came out and I could just buy gross lots of C batteries.
_______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
