In message <[email protected]>, Dennis Ferguson wr ites:
>> If so, frequency stability is priority number one and time is >> probably just "better than 100msec" or so > >I could swear I saw something that said "50 ns", though I can You can _almost_ do that with loran, if you know your l/l coords. >indicates they aren't just looking at Loran by itself. The >MF dGPS bands and 500 kHz are also included in whatever they >are doing. Which indicates to me that they are pretty damn serious, and not just catering to some recently discovered VIP Loran-C users. I'd be very surprised if LightSquared nuking GPS reliability doesn't have something to do with this. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
