In message <20120315043646.1bc3f11b...@karen.lavabit.com>, "Charles P. Steinmet z" writes:
>As others have pointed >out, it isn't accurate enough for true time nut performance, and to >get all of what it *is* capable of requires heroic efforts. And isn't that what being a time-nut is all about ? VLF signals, once they have phase-code, are pretty good for frequency stabilization, you just need to use an averaging time of 24 hours. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
