On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:01:13 +0000
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >That said, i think this can be ignored for all practical purposes
> >in an VLF receiver, as the enviromental changes in the atmospheric
> >signal path are much larger than the small error you get from the
> >filter. But then again, time nuts are time nuts ;)
>
> Again: it most certainly can not be ignored for Loran-C
Could you explain why? Yes, you need a higher BW for Loran-C,
but the phase(f) function will give you only a distortion of
the signal and a constant time delay in your signal recovery.
But that shouldnt degrade the usefullness of the system.
What am i missing here?
Attila Kinali
--
Why does it take years to find the answers to
the questions one should have asked long ago?
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
