On 3/30/12 4:16 PM, Javier Herrero wrote:
I suppose that when it was photographed, nobody noticed it. After
noticed that it was no correctly plugged-in, the past pictures were
reviewed and found that in fact it was not fully plugged in :)
We do this all the time at JPL. You have someone come in and take lots
of pictures, sort of en masse. If something goes wrong, then you go
back and look at the pictures. Sometimes it's a tiny detail that wasn't
noticeable until you knew what to look for.
(and we've also had loose connector problems.. thankfully not in space
that I'm aware of, but I've had more than one SMA that wasn't fully
torqued. You can't tell the difference by looking whether it was finger
tight or torqued. But after rolling the rack of gear around and
shipping it across country a couple times.....)
El 31/03/2012 01:04, iov...@inwind.it escribió:
May anybody out there explain why the connector was simply
photographed, and
not put in place, on October 13, that is one month before the updated
version
(Nov 17) of the Opera paper?
Antonio I8IOV
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
