In fact, I do believe the paper is a voice of rationality in an ocean oh hype. Very expensive hype, promoted by shameless hucksters.
-John =========== > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:57 AM, MailLists <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hearing tests showed the ability to discern jitter above a few hundred >> nanoseconds rms. >> http://amorgignitamorem.nl/Audio/Jitter/Detection%20threshold%20for%20distortions%20due%20to%20jitter%20on%20digital%20audio%2026_50.pdf >> >> Others claim the ability to detect jitter in the picoseconds range... > > If we are to believe the above paper,then those guys who claim to hear > pS jitter are wrong. Likely they can also here is a fuse is is place > in the holder "backwards". > > So by the above, no now can hear 250 nS of jitter. I really doubt > any decent system other then the most low-cost consumer level junk has > jitter at the 250 nS level. Even a TTL "can oscillator" is better > than that. > > A TTL can that is marked "4.096 MHz" costs about $2 and will make a > square wave with a period of very close to 250 nS. Then they divide > this down to the sample rate of 96KHz. In order to see a 250 nS > jitter in the 96K signal the TTL can would have to "skip a beat". > 250 nS is is a huge error and you don't get there with digital noise > > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
