These types of pulses should be routed as open-ended source-terminated reflected wave switched transmission lines. Power will only flow for nanoseconds as the pulse travels over the line. There won't be a drop of 50% of the voltage at the target and no large power spikes in the unit or requirements for proper impedance matching at the receiver side.
Some units like the thunderbolt look quite bad driving a 50 ohms transmission line, others that are designed with proper 50 ohms series impedance create a sharp nice signal. Bye, Said Sent from my iPad On May 14, 2012, at 17:21, "Tom Van Baak" <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote: > Mark, > > I too once preferred 50% duty cycle 1 Hz signals because they seemed more > "natural". But one day during an experiment where I was comparing a large set > of clocks I noticed my lab's digital AC power meter was jumping by tens of > watts every second. > > When a dozen DUT generate 1PPS along with as many REF pulses (via cascaded > pulse distribution amps) and then these all go to both inputs of a TIC and > there's also LED's on both TIC channels as well as the dist amps, the net > load is enormous. The last thing you want in a precision timing lab is to > load your AC line down exactly once a second. Remember 5V into 50R is 0.1 > Amps. That was a modest amount of current in the 1950's, but massive overkill > today. > > So that's why I now prefer short (e.g., 1 ms or 10 us) pulses. > > /tvb > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
