On 10 June 2012 02:05, gary <[email protected]> wrote: > My recollection is NEC2 has a bug (i.e. can't model) conductive booms.
It's not a bug. Essentially the current is assumed to flow in the direction of the segment, which is not the case on a boom. It's that assumption that worries me in using it for things like a helix, or most things to be honest. I'm sure it can do a lot more than I trust it to do, but I'm never confident the model will be accurate. > Otherwise I thought it was pretty accurate. > > It sure is a kick in the groin to use. MMANA-GAL has quite a nice front end. It is one hell of a lot easier to use than HFSS, but I trust HFSS more. Dave _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
