Who said that?

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 23, 2012, at 2:56 PM, paul swed <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am reading thread and getting a good chuckle in a lot of respects.
> SRS good or bad humps and bumps.
> Then it hit me. I have a HP5065a and its great.
> But, someone here is willing to buy it for $5000!
> I think we can strike a deal. :-) Its american, has documentation, and is
> HP. Sweet!
> 
> Regards
> Paul
> WB8TSL
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:37 PM, David Kirkby <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> On 23 August 2012 18:39, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> It's really very simple:  If it was, the company that made them would
>>> now be owned either by some rich mafioso or a western company.
>>> 
>>> If it is no good, the company is still locally owned or bankrupt.
>> 
>> 
>> I think given this hear is Russian military, I doubt there would have
>> been much chance for it to be evaulated by companies like Agilent. The
>> specifications would not be published, they could not buy one. It's
>> possible the first Western countries will see of this sort of thing is
>> when it appears on eBay.
>> 
>> I'm not saying this is good, but it might possibly be.
>> 
>> Looking at a lot of the other things this seller has, the specs are
>> well below what one can get from companies like Agilent. Volt meters
>> with 1% error are hardly precision by todays standards.
>> 
>> Dave
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to