Hi I still think the original idea about a FOA filing is a *very* good one. Don't go after the receiver. Go after all the details about the transmit format.
Bob -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Miller Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:55 PM To: [email protected]; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Now a Monopoly Class action suit anyone? ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Forster" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:46 PM Subject: [time-nuts] WWVB Now a Monopoly I just received this in reply to a query ablot the availability of receiver designs for the new WWVB format: ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: WWVB Protocol Notification From: "John Lowe" <[email protected]> Date: Wed, September 26, 2012 9:13 am To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> "Lowe, John P" <[email protected]> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- No sir, the government does not have a receiver design. The design has been created by Xtendwave under an SBIR grant. Their design is proprietary. Sorry, John ================ To me this reads... If you want to use the publicly financed WWVB service, you MUST buy the Xtendwave hardware. This is an outrage, IMO. YMMV -John ============ _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
