[email protected] said: > So it should be possible to implement a receiver without infringing any > patents and without reams of signal processing code.
How well would your scheme work with poor signal/noise? Some of us consider "reams of signal processing code" to be as much fun as wiring up chips. It would be fun to compare the costs of various approaches. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
