Thanks Said.  This is a learning experience but it is fun watching it settle 
down.  I will stop fiddling with the settings and just let it do it's thing.  I 
am watching the output with my qs1r direct digital to spectrumlab.  This way I 
don't have to worry about any audio glitches. I have been recording frequency 
every minute the entire time to see what it is doing.

Sent from mobile

On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Said Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Doc,
> 
> You are on the right track, efc scale affects SD as you can see.
> 
> The phaseco parameter is used to push down the average TI to 0ns. Higher 
> values push faster.
> 
> If your ocxo is still drifting (aging and or retrace) it will take about 48 
> hours for the aging measurement and correction to kick in, and bring the 
> offset down to 0ns.
> 
> Bye
> Said
> 
> Sent From iPhone
> 
> On Oct 3, 2012, at 3:46, Bill Dailey <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> ok..  So that may very well be true of this unit.  Electrical tuning is
>> 3E-7  0 - 5v (+/-).  It also lists a digital tuning range of +- 3Hz at
>> 10MHz.  Correct me if I am wrong but that appears to mean 3Hz electrical
>> and 6Hz digital tuning range.   I am not doing digital tuning but thought I
>> would throw that out there.
>> 
>> I have been trying to "optimize" parameters on this Fury board but it seems
>> my "optimization" has just been increasing the deviation.  Running 1.8 ns
>> sd overnight with an average TI of about 26ns (was with my "optimized"
>> settings)...the original settings were giving me a much lower deviation...I
>> didnt log it but looking at the graph of frequency in excel I would say
>> probably between 0.1-0.6 ns.  I just put it back on the original settings
>> and am letting it settle now.  Was adjusting Dampening, EFCSCALE and DAC
>> gain.  My observations reveal dampening makes it a bit slower to respond
>> and perhaps settles it some, The efcscale seems to act as pure gain on top
>> of the baseline dac gain which is essentially determined by the tuning
>> range as you referred to.  What I saw with a low efcscale is that the TI
>> was higher but the SD lower... with efc scale higher the TI was lower but
>> the SD suffered.
>> 
>> Since my goal here is low noise and very good short term stability I prefer
>> the lower efcscale  (low gain with low SD).
>> 
>> Let me know if I have any gross conceptual errors here or if I am looking
>> at this properly.
>> 
>> Doc
>> KX0O
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> [email protected] said:
>>>> I am ok for awhile but how do you center the efc of an ocxo?  I
>>> understand
>>>> there is something (screw) to adjust the ocxo so it is approximately on
>>> freq
>>>> with 2.5v efc.
>>> 
>>>> Specific oscillator datum-1111c. I have he datasheet but doesn't say
>>> "coarse
>>>> frequency adjust this screw" or some such.
>>> 
>>> There may not be a coarse adjustment.  If the tuning range is big enough to
>>> cover the aging over your design life, you don't need one.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> There is a tradeoff between adjustment range and the number of bits you
>>> need
>>> in a DAC to get a required accuracy.
>>> 
>>> Suppose I have an adjustment range of 1 Hz (peak to peak) on a 10 MHz
>>> oscillator.  That's 1 part is 10^7.  If I have a 10 bit DAC, I can adjust
>>> to
>>> 1 part is 10^10.  A 20 bit DAC can get to 1 part is 10^13.
>>> 
>>> But if the tuning range is 10 Hz, the same 20 bit DAC setup only gets you
>>> to
>>> 1 part is 10^12.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, go to
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Doc
>> 
>> Bill Dailey
>> KXØO
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to